Saturday 1 November 2014

Meta Data, the AFP Commissioner and a whole lot of  shit!!!!
So on thursday  dinosaur  Australian Federal Police Commissioner Andrew Colvin who obviously has no fucking idea about the internet said that the meta data that internet companies  were now required to keep for 2 years   would be used to track down people who pirated movies and music. Clearly this fucker did not realize that in fact  copyright was not a criminal offence even though he holds  the position of Top Cop in Australia.
Then on Friday Colvin backed down on his threat because someone had mentioned to him that this was actually none of the fucking AFP's business.
Considering that any hacker wanting to download pirated movies or music would use a proxy server in a far away country  and therefore hide their tracks  and anyone that has turned to "THE DARK SIDE"  will do the same who is  the AFP and  the Australian Parliament think they are going to catch with these new laws??????
It appears Abbott is just sucking up to Obama and Colvin is just a puppet who has no fucking idea what so ever!!!!!!

Friday 31 October 2014

Ian Lazar engaged in criminal activity for a decade, court told

This is the jewish shonk along with his father Rabbi David Rogut 
threatened to take me to court for exposing his many court cases on the internet because in their very simple minds it was ANTISEMITIC!!!!!!!! REALLY????????
Ian Lazar was arrested on Thursday for allegedly defrauding an elderly woman whom he saw on A Current Affair.
Ian Lazar was arrested on Thursday for allegedly defrauding an elderly woman whom he saw on A Current Affair. Photo: Police Media
A colourful Sydney financier accused of defrauding an elderly woman of her home has engaged in criminal activity for a decade, a court has been told.
Ian Lazar appeared before Sydney's Central Local Court on Friday charged with obtain financial advantage by deception after being arrested on Thursday outside the North Sydney apartment block where he lives with his pregnant fiancee.
Police allege that the 43-year-old lender of last resort fraudulently obtained ownership of the elderly woman's Nambucca home after he saw her detailing her financial woes on A Current Affair in July 2003.
During a bail application the court heard that Mr Lazar's alleged victim was 88 years old at the time of the offence and that after she was evicted in 2009, she died homeless. 
Advertisement
Police prosecutor Sergeant Vanessa Robichaux told the court that Mr Lazar was part of a "larger criminal organisation" and there were a number of other victims of the group.
A number of Crown witnesses had also been threatened about coming forward to make complaints, she said. 
The court was told that police will allege Mr Lazar has been engaging in criminality for 10 years.
But Mr Lazar's barrister, Richard Mitry, told the court if that was the case then police should have arrested him earlier.
Mr Mitry said his client had instead been the victim of a campaign against him by police and the media which was fuelled by disgruntled investors who couldn't afford to repay Mr Lazar.
He also denied that Mr Lazar was part of a criminal group, telling the court that many of those to whom he is alleged to have links were engaged in legal disputes with him.
Mr Mitry said Mr Lazar should be granted bail because he had known for "two to three years" that he was the subject of a police investigation and had not fled during that time.
But Magistrate Mark Buscombe refused bail, saying Mr Lazar posed a an unacceptable risk as he was concerned about allegations that threatening emails had been sent to a potential witness.
Police will allege that after seeing the woman on A Current Affair, Mr Lazar contacted the show, claiming to be backed by community-minded investors who wanted to pay off the woman's debts as an act of generosity.
After being put in touch with the woman it is alleged that Mr Lazar and an associate made arrangements to pay off the woman's debts.
But when she went to sell her home in 2006 and move to the Southern Highlands to be closer to family she discovered the property had been transferred into the name of a company she did not know.
When she contacted Mr Lazar she was told there had been a mix-up and that it would be resolved. But it was not and in 2009 she was evicted from her home. 
The case against Mr Lazar returns to court in January.

Thursday 30 October 2014

Leading prosecutor Margaret Cunneen and her eldest son investigated for allegedly perverting course of justice

Date
  • 96 reading now

Every dog has its day and the day is coming for dodgy

prosecutor  Margaret Cunneen who protected

the pervert Scott Volkers





Investigations reporter

Margaret Cunneen: accused of perverting the course of justice.
Margaret Cunneen: accused of perverting the course of justice. Photo: Peter Rae
The corruption watchdog has revealed it is investigating one of the state's top prosecutors over allegations she perverted the course of justice, in a move that will send shockwaves through the legal community.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption said on Thursday that it would hold a public inquiry into allegations that deputy senior Crown prosecutor Margaret Cunneen, SC, and her son Stephen Wyllie counselled his girlfriend, Sophia Tilley, to "pretend to have chest pains" to prevent police officers from obtaining evidence of her blood alcohol level at the scene of a car accident on May 31 this year.
The commission is investigating whether this was done "with the intention to pervert the course of justice".
Car crash: Sophia Tilley and Stephen Wyllie.
Car crash: Sophia Tilley and Stephen Wyllie. Photo: Stephen Wyllie/Facebook
Ms Tilley allegedly took the advice.
Advertisement
The public inquiry will start on Monday, November 10, and is expected to run for three days.
"As this matter involves a senior public official involved in the administration of justice in New South Wales, the Commission considered it appropriate for a person from outside New South Wales to preside at the inquiry," the commission said in a statement.
Queensland barrister Alan MacSporran, QC, a former Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Commissioner has been appointed an assistant commissioner to preside at the public inquiry.
Counsel assisting the commission will be Sydney barrister Michael Fordham, SC.
Former premier Barry O'Farrell appointed Ms Cunneen to preside over the special commission of inquiry into claims of interference in police investigations of alleged paedophile priests in the Hunter region.
Attorney-General Brad Hazzard said on Thursday that the Director of Public Prosecutions, Lloyd Babb, SC, had "advised me that in discussions with Ms Cunneen, SC, she has agreed that it is appropriate for her to stand aside and to have no active involvement in any current prosecution or future prosecution until the resolution of the ICAC hearing whereupon the situation will be reviewed".
"It is important to recognise that any individual appearing before ICAC has the presumption of innocence and Ms Cunneen, as with any other NSW citizen, has an absolute entitlement in that regard," Mr Hazzard said.
"The matter will now proceed through the normal processes of ICAC."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/leading-prosecutor-margaret-cunneen-and-her-eldest-son-investigated-for-allegedly-perverting-course-of-justice-20141030-3j6fe.html#ixzz3Hctb0M00
Dodgy Whitehouse Design School gives the Shonky Australian Prime Minister's Daughter  a $60,000 scholarship.

Clearly this is in the Public interest that this be exposed!!!!!
The Dodgy Prime Minister Tony Abbott has an equally dodgy daughter!!!!
The Sydney student who leaked information about a fashion school scholarship controversially awarded to the daughter of Prime Minister Tony Abbott sincerely believed she was acting in the public interest and was unaware she was breaking the law.
Freya Rachael Sommerville Newman, 21, used her position as a part-time librarian at the Whitehouse Institute of Design to obtain information about the $60,000 director's scholarship awarded to Frances Abbott in 2011. 
Ms Newman pleaded guilty last month to accessing restricted data. The offence carried a maximum penalty of two years' jail.

At a sentencing hearing in the Downing Centre Local Court on Thursday, Ms Newman's barrister, Tony Payne, SC, asked magistrate Teresa O'Sullivan to place the university student on a bond and not record a conviction due to the "significant extra-curial punishment" she had suffered since becoming a whistleblower.
He said she was experiencing anxiety due to the high level of media coverage her case had generated and a psychiatric report was tendered in support of this, although Ms O'Sullivan agreed to suppress sensitive parts of it.
Advertisement 
"A sense of injustice motivated Ms Newman, not greed or a desire for notoriety or to embarrass Ms Abbott," Mr Payne said.
"She was not aware that her actions were against the law or that her identity would become known."
Mr Payne said Ms Newman had heard some senior Whitehouse staff members talk about the Managing Director's Scholarship Ms Abbott had been awarded by the institute's founder Leanne Whitehouse in February 2011. At the time, Mr Abbott was the leader of the opposition.
It was with their "knowledge and encouragement" that Ms Newman used the user name and password of another staff member at the institute to access its student record system, without the staff member's knowledge.
A police facts sheet alleged Ms Newman then took screen shots of the information from the system and emailed two other institute employees, saying: " ... there's a bit about Frances meeting with Leanne J, the CEO of Whitehouse Institute on February 21, 2011 and then receiving a Managing Director's Scholarship three days later."
Soon after, she sent another email saying: "Got 'em – might go meet Chris now to talk tactics, see you tomorrow."
The police said this was a reference to Chris Graham, the editor and publisher of the New Matilda website, which published an article about Ms Abbott's scholarship the following day.
Ms Newman, a student at the University of Technology, Sydney, resigned from Whitehouse straight away.
Mr Payne said Ms Newman acknowledged accessing the database was a breach of her employer's trust, but "no significant harm" had befallen Ms Abbott as a result. Further, Ms Newman had sent a letter to Ms Abbott apologising for any distress.
He said Ms Newman was a "vulnerable young woman" who had inadvertently gained a reputation as a whistleblower, which would affect her education and employment prospects for years. A conviction would also restrict her ability to travel to some countries.
Because Whitehouse was a private school and not a public institution, Ms Newman was not protected under whistleblower legislation.
The Whitehouse Institute denied providing Ms Abbott with any special treatment.
Police opposed a bond and submitted that a conviction should be recorded.
Dozens of supporters, some bearing placards saying "Free Freya" and "Protect Whistleblowers", turned up at court, although Mr Payne said his client had taken no part in any of the campaigns that had sprung up in response to her case.
Ms Newman, who was accompanied by her parents, will be sentenced on November 25


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/frances-abbott-scholarship-whistleblower-motivated-by-injustice-court-told-20141023-11amzs.html#ixzz3HcpoFWQm

Wednesday 1 October 2014

Northern Territory  shonkey Magistrate

Another dodgy Magistrate exposed!!!!

Royal commission: NT magistrate Michael Carey admits recommendation to drop court action against sex offender did not meet guidelines

Updated
A Northern Territory magistrate has admitted a recommendation he made in 2002 to drop court action against sex offender Don Henderson was made quickly, and did not meet guidelines.
At the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the NT's Acting Chief Magistrate Michael Carey gave evidence about a memo he sent in 2002 when he worked at the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
The memo sent to the DPP recommends dropping court action against Mr Henderson, a convicted sex offender who the royal commission has heard molested several children who were housed at the Retta Dixon home in Darwin.
The note from Mr Carey in 2002 has been described as "pivotal" to the decision to drop action against Mr Henderson, who was never prosecuted for his alleged crimes while working as a house parent at Retta Dixon.
Under questioning from Counsel Assisting the Commission, Sophie David, Mr Carey agreed the memo failed to adhere to prosecutor guidelines.
He admitted the memo did not, as it was supposed to, include reference or analysis to an application for new trials for Mr Henderson, and nor did it include references to Mr Henderson's history as a sex offender.
The memo also did not include the views of the officer in charge or victims, as guidelines direct.
"You would agree that this memorandum does not comply with the the prosecutor guidelines in respect of what should be in a discontinuance report?" Ms David asked.
"Yes," Mr Carey said.
Mr Carey also admitted the decision in 2002 was made within 24 hours of getting the file on Mr Henderson.
"I don't know why it was done in such haste," Mr Carey said.
Mr Henderson has been linked to scores of child abuse allegations, documents tendered to the commission show.
In 1984 he was convicted of molesting two boys at a public swimming pool in Darwin.

Apology from ministry in charge at Retta Dixon

Reverend Trevor Leggott, the head of the ministry that cared for children at Retta Dixon, has apologised for the sexual and physical abuse they suffered, but said his group could not offer money to victims.
"To hear those stories related to the people that I would call family has been extremely painful for me to hear and that is why I offer the most sincere apologies," Reverend Leggott said.
Reverend Leggott is the general-director of Australian Indigenous Ministry (AIM), whose forerunner, the Aboriginal Inland Mission, ran the Retta Dixon home.
The facility housed mainly Aboriginal children between 1946 and 1980.
I know the hurt that has been caused to these people is not going to be fixed by money.
Reverend Trevor Leggott, head of Australian Indigenous Ministries

Last week the inquiry heard often graphic accounts from nine former Retta Dixon residents who suffered physical or sexual abuse, including numerous examples of alleged abuse by Mr Henderson.
Reverend Leggott said his ministry lived a "hand-to-mouth existence" and did not have the funds available to give compensation payments to victims of abuse at Retta Dixon.
"It seems extremely difficult for me that we can offer it," he told the royal commission.
"I know there can be recompense in terms of money, but I know the hurt that has been caused to these people is not going to be fixed by money," he said.

Ministry has 'substantial number of properties'

Under questioning from Ms David, Reverend Leggott admitted his organisation did own a substantial number of properties in New South Wales, Queensland and the Northern Territory.
But he said most of the properties were held by trusts and local churches - AIM did not own them.
He said the ministry did own some properties itself, including an office in Humpty Doo and a home in the Blue Mountains in NSW, so there was some capacity to set up a compensation scheme.
"Only if we were to realise those assets and that meant that we couldn't do the work that we are doing presently," he said.
To heckles from the public gallery at the Darwin Supreme Court, Reverend Leggott also testified he did know of any abuse at Retta Dixon until he received papers from the royal commission.

Standard of kinship care for Indigenous children 'relaxed'

Earlier the royal commission heard Indigenous children looked after by relatives in the Northern Territory do not recieve the same standard of care as children placed with other carers.
NT Children's Commissioner Howard Bath told the inquiry he generally backed a policy of putting Aboriginal children in need of care with relatives, and if that is not possible then into care with people of the same culture.

Despite that principle the inquiry heard that the NT had the lowest placement rate for Aboriginal children with Aboriginal carers in Australia.
Dr Bath said that standards of care in general were lower with kinship carers.
"There are some ways to go before you can say the standard of care offered to those kids, and I am talking generally, is the same as for all other kids that need protection," Dr Bath said.
He said in some very remote communities the disadvantaged circumstances meant it was practically much harder to find a suitable placements and because of the larger size of Aboriginal families, often there were fewer adults able to look after children.
"The reality is some of those standards tend to be relaxed," he said.
"Some of the data that we provided say five years ago showed very clearly that more of the kinship carers weren't registered as carers and more of them had difficulty in terms of receiving training for example, were less likely to recieve training that non-kinship carers."
Asked why the policy of putting Indigenous children into the care of relatives was seen as preferable, Dr Bath said it helped preserve a sense of identity for the child and helped address the "historic mistakes of the past".
He said being with someone of the same cultural background also helped protect a child against the trauma and dislocation after they are removed from their family.

Freedom of Expression and the First Amendment
A Texas court has thrown out a law prohibiting ‘up the skirt’ photography, on the grounds the previous ruling violated Texas’ citizens’ constitutional right to freedom of expression.
Another Law that America is using for other purposes other than what it was meant for!!! It is also a case where the press stirred up paranoia without reporting the facts orectly. The Media reports it is the upskirt Law. This is totally shit!!!!
Clearly no violation here just media trying to fuck every stupid American over!!!
Listen to the court before the Media!!!!


The Texas Court of Appeals ruled 8-1 to strike down part of a law which bans taking images of another person in public without their consent and with the intention to “arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person”, criticising the “paternalistic” intrusion into peoples’ private right to be aroused.
Debjani Roy, deputy director of Hollaback!, a New York-based anti-street harassment group, speaking to the Guardian, claimed the decision was “a huge violation and absolutely appalling that the rights of predators are being valued over the rights of women and girls.”
Halie Ricketts, a victim of an ‘up the skirt’ shot in an Austin mall earlier this year, commented: “Currently the law is protecting the criminals and not the victims”.
The individual, who Ms Ricketts claims stuck a camera up her skirt and took a photograph, has not been charged.
The judges’ decision, released on Wednesday, said “photographs and visual recordings are inherently expressive”, as is the process creating them, ensuring their protection under the First Amendment.
Presiding judge Sharon Keller explained: “Protecting someone who appears in public from being the object of sexual thoughts seems to be the sort of ‘paternalistic interest in regulating the defendants mind’ the First Amendment was designed to guard against.”
The ruling stemmed from the arrest of a man in his 50s named Ronald Thompson, who was stopped by police officers alerted by concerned parents in SeaWorld, San Antonio in 2011. Officers later found 73 images of children in swimsuits after confiscating his camera.
The prosecution said lawbreakers could not hide behind a freedom of speech defence, claiming photography was a technical process not covered by a constitutional right.
However, lawyers for Mr Thompson argued the above-mentioned law was “the stuff of Orwellian ‘thought-crime’”.
They claimed the legislation failed to distinguish between ‘up the skirt’ photography and taking an image of a girl walking down the street – suggesting it could be used to criminalise paparazzi photojournalists.
Mr Thompson was indicted by a grand jury on 26 felony counts of improper photography.
Freedom of expression Criminal Court Appeal Texas
This man was at a swimming pool taking underwater shots. The "thought police " said he was a pervert. Clearly he was not!!!
This is another example of one law being used for some other purpose other than what it was meant for!!!

In re Thompson

Justia.com Opinion Summary: Appellant was charged with twenty-six counts of improper photography or visual recording. Each count of the indictment alleged appellant, “with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of THE DEFENDANT, did by electronic means record another . . . at a location that was not a bathroom or private dressing room.” Each count further specified the name of an “.avi” file that was recorded. Some of the counts contained additional information regarding the subject matter and location of the recording. Appellant filed a pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged that the statute on which his prosecution was based was facially unconstitutional in violation of the First Amendment. The trial court denied the application, and appellant appealed. The “improper photography or visual recording” statute makes it a crime to, among other things, photograph or record by electronic means a visual image of another person under certain circumstances. Subsection (b)(1) of the statute makes such acts a crime if: (1) the person being photographed or recorded is not in a bathroom or private dressing room; (2) the photograph or recording of the person is made without that person’s consent; and (3) the photograph or recording is made with the intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that, to the extent that it proscribed taking photographs and recording visual images, Subsection (b)(1) of the statute was facially unconstitutional in violation of the freedom of speech guarantee of the First Amendment. Consequently, the Court affirmed the Court of Appeals.

Tuesday 2 September 2014


  • Tony Abbott as Opposition Leader visits a batts factory in 2010. (Source: AAP)
1/  
Peter Garret released this Royal Commission into the Home Insulation Program
I will be studying the report, in consultation with my lawyers, and then making a full statement in the very near future.Clearly Peter Garret is simply a useless fuck that was part of the Labor Government
Mark Arbib , the shonky Labor Senator  who also refuses responsibility for this matter now works for James Packer.
And did shonky Adam Toma  play a significant part in the casino licence of James Packers Casino?

A Royal Commission has concluded the former Labor government's Home Insulation Scheme was fundamentally flawed, and deaths associated with it could have been avoided.
By 
Thea Cowie
 
Source 
World News Radio
2 SEP 2014 - 12:09 PM  UPDATED YESTERDAY 1:37 PM
(Transcripts from SBS World News Radio)
A Royal Commission has concluded the former Labor government's Home Insulation Scheme was fundamentally flawed, and deaths associated with it could have been avoided.
Tabling the report in parliament, Prime Minister Tony Abbott has blamed what he calls the Rudd government's "dysfunctional culture".
Thea Cowie reports.
(Click on the audio tab above to hear the full report)
Fundamentally flawed, rushed and unregulated - they're just some of the criticisms levelled at the so-called "Pink Batts" program in the Royal Commission report.
The $2.8 billion scheme began in February 2009 and was designed to stimulate the economy during the global financial crisis.
It was terminated a year later following hundreds of house fires, and the deaths of four installers, three from electrocution and one from heat exhaustion.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott says some good should come out of the report into a bad scheme.
"I hope that this report brings some comfort to everyone affected. The report's findings are grave and its recommendations are detailed. It details a litany of failures arising from a dysfunctional culture."
Mr Abbott says the government will provide a preliminary response to the report by the end of the month, and a final response by the end of the year.
"The Government's response will focus on ensuring that such a catastrophic policy failure never happens again. I thank the Royal Commissioner, and his staff, for their work. I particularly thank the victims' families who shared their anguish with the Commission. (hear, hear)"
The Royal Commission's brief was to examine how the Labor government assessed workplace health and safety risks of the program, and whether warnings were dealt with adequately.
In the report, author Ian Hanger says the installers would not have died if the program had been properly designed and implemented.
"The reality is that the Australian government conceived of, devised, designed and implemented a program that enabled very large numbers of inexperienced workers - often engaged by unscrupulous and avaricious employers or head contractors, who were themselves inexperienced in insulation installation - to undertake potentially dangerous work."
The report finds the Rudd government failed to identify and manage the risk of injury or death for installers, and was too slow in making changes to the program after the death of the first installer.
Other conclusions are that the government relaxed the training requirements; planning was sacrificed for speed; and the environment department was ill-equipped to deal with such a large, complex program.
Labor's legal affairs spokesman Mark Dreyfus says there's nothing new in the costly, 361 page report.
"We've expressed concern at all times that that $20 million, or perhaps more, needed to produce an outcome - something of use. That's why I started today by saying we very much hope that the families of the four installers who died will take some comfort from this exercise, because at the moment it doesn't appear that the report, despite its length, has really advanced much beyond what was already known at the end of the eight previous inquiries."
The report calls for the establishment of a new law to penalise companies that defraud government programs.
The inquiry heard evidence that $24 million worth of fraudulent claims against the insulation program were written off by the then government.
Labor Leader Bill Shorten says it is not the time for a political fight.
"If there are lessons in this report which can improve safety so that other families never have to go through this again, then we will approach that appropriately. We're up for any improvements we can make to safety, and the lessons. We're not up for a political blame game."
In May, former prime minister Kevin Rudd told the commission he accepted ultimate responsibility for the program's failings.
But he did not accept that burden alone.
He said former Labor environment minister Peter Garrett, parliamentary secretary Mark Arbib and numerous public servants all had duties to monitor certain issues.