Friday, 18 July 2014


FOI Australian Public Service Audit Committee

So  who is on the Australian Public Service Audit Committee and fails to hold dodgy Sedgewick accountable for protecting shonky Agency Heads   and   provides false certificates of compliance????


From: FOI@apsc.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:34:58 +1000
Subject: RE: FOI request [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Ms Brown

I refer to your FOI request of 19 June for the names of members of the Australian Public Service Commission’s Audit Committee.  We are consulting one or more of those individuals about disclosure of their personal information under the FOI Act.  In these circumstances, the timeframe for responding to an FOI request is extended by 30 days.  We will contact you again in the near future.

Regards
____________________________________________________Chris Luton
Australian Public Service Commission

p : 02 6202 3571 | f : 02 6250 4437
e : 
chris.luton@apsc.gov.au | w : www.apsc.gov.au


FOI  Australian Public Service Commission/ Dodgy Robert Cornall AO
So apart form doing the dodgy report and investigation into Manus Island which cost $83,000 Dodgy Robert Cornall has done 2 investigations into misconduct by Federal Government Agency Heads under S41(m)
It is hardly surprising there is so much systemic corrupt conduct in Government agencies  when investigations are not independent.
As this dodgy Cornall was secretary of the Attorney Generals department and therefore fails any independence test.
 Taking a look through the annual reports it  is also revealed Commissioner Steve Sedgwick also fucked over  every whistle-blower and all those who made complaints about Agency Heads. Clearly the Shonky Sedgwick has also a vested interest in protecting systemic corrupt conduct and corruption in Government Agencies



From: FOI@apsc.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:02:22 +1000
Subject: RE: FOI Robert Cornall [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Ms Brown

The two investigations were conducted for the purposes of the Commissioner’s function under paragraph 41(1)(f) of the Public Service Act 1999 “to inquire into alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct by Agency Heads”.  Please note that section 41 of the Public Service Act 1999 was amended in 2013 and this power is now found under paragraph 41(1)(m).

Regards
____________________________________________________Chris Luton
Australian Public Service Commission

p : 02 6202 3571 | f : 02 6250 4437
e : 
chris.luton@apsc.gov.au | w : www.apsc.gov.au

PUBLIC SERVICE ACT 1999 - SECT 41

Commissioner's functions
             (1)  The Commissioner has the following functions:
                     (a)  to strengthen the professionalism of the APS and facilitate continuous improvement in workforce management in the APS;
                     (b)  to uphold high standards of integrity and conduct in the APS;
                     (c)  to monitor, review and report on APS capabilities within and between Agencies to promote high standards of accountability, effectiveness and performance.
             (2)  Without limiting subsection (1), the Commissioner's functions include the following:
                     (a)  to foster, and contribute to, leadership, high quality learning and development and career management in the APS;
                     (b)  to lead the thinking about, provide advice on and drive reforms to workforce management policies so that the APS is ready for future demands;
                     (c)  to develop, review and evaluate APS workforce management policies and practices and maintain appropriate databases;
                     (d)  to foster an APS workforce that reflects the diversity of the Australian population;
                     (e)  to promote the APS Values, the APS Employment Principles and the Code of Conduct;
                      (f)  to evaluate the extent to which Agencies incorporate and uphold the APS Values and the APS Employment Principles;
                     (g)  to partner with Secretaries in the stewardship of the APS;
                     (h)  to provide advice and assistance to Agencies on public service matters;
                      (i)  to work with other governments (including foreign governments) on matters relating to public sector workforce management, leadership and career management;
                      (j)  to review any matter relating to the APS;
                     (k)  to review any matter relating to the APS referred to the Commissioner by the Public Service Minister, and report on that matter to the Public Service Minister;
                      (l)  to evaluate the adequacy of systems and procedures in Agencies for ensuring compliance with the Code of Conduct;
                    (m)  to inquire, in accordance with section 41A, into alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct by Agency Heads;
                     (n)  to inquire into and determine, in accordance with section 41B, whether an APS employee, or a former APS employee, has breached the Code of Conduct;
                     (o)  to inquire, subject to the regulations, into public interest disclosures (within the meaning of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 ), to the extent that the disclosures relate to alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct;
                     (p)  such other functions as are conferred on the Commissioner by this Act, the regulations or any other law;
                     (q)  such other functions as the Prime Minister, by legislative instrument, directs the Commissioner to perform;
                      (r)  to do anything incidental to or conducive to the performance of any of the Commissioner's functions.
Note:          Neither section 42 (disallowance) nor Part 6 (sunsetting) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 applies to a direction given under paragraph (2)(q) (see sections 44 and 54 of that Act).
Reports may include recommendations
             (3)  A report made by the Commissioner in the performance of his or her functions may include recommendations.
Fees
             (4)  The regulations may authorise the Commissioner to charge fees (on behalf of the Commonwealth) for the performance, on request, of the Commissioner's functions.

Monday, 14 July 2014

FOI  APSC/ Robert Cornall/ dodgy Karin Fisher

Clearly dodgy Karin Fisher is attempting  to DODGE FOI's
It is amuzing how shonky this woman is.......
So I am aware Cornall protected one agency head under S41 of the APS  Act but what was the other one???


From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: foi@apsc.gov.au
Subject: RE: FOI Robert Cornall [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:49:44 +1000

Hi Karin,
please advise me under what section of the Australian Public Service Act did Cornall investigate these individuals?
Thank you
Fiona Brown


From: FOI@apsc.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:12:19 +1000
Subject: RE: FOI Robert Cornall [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Ms Brown

Mr Cornall was engaged by the Commission to investigate allegations that had been made to the Australian Public Service Commissioner about the conduct of certain individuals.  The allegations and details about the investigations include sensitive personal information and are confidential.

Regards
____________________________________________________Chris Luton
Australian Public Service Commission

p : 02 6202 3571 | f : 02 6250 4437
e : 
chris.luton@apsc.gov.au | w : www.apsc.gov.au

Friday, 11 July 2014

FOI/  Australian Public Service Commission/ Dodgy Robert Cornall

So what was the other inquiry that Dodgy Robert Cornall  did for the APSC?
One was to protect and coverup for an Agency Head under S41 of the APS Act but what was the other one for?
Also Senator Hansen Young  was outraged  dodgy Cornall   was paid 83,000 by the Australian Government to do a report  shonky  report on  Manus Island and the asylum seeker riots!!





From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: foi@apsc.gov.au
Subject: RE: FOI Robert Cornall [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:30:06 +1000

Hi Chris,
Can you please  verify what  2 investigations Robert Cornall did for the APSC.
Thank you 
Fiona  Brown


From: FOI@apsc.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:36:54 +1000
Subject: RE: FOI Robert Cornall [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Ms Brown

I refer to your request for information about the number of investigations conducted by Mr Robert Cornall for the Australian Public Service Commission since 2010.

I have made inquiries with the relevant areas in the Commission and two investigations were identified which were undertaken by Mr Cornall since 2010.

Please note that your request was not a valid request for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 because your request was for information, not for specific documents.  However, we have provided you with the information requested.

Regards
____________________________________________________Chris Luton
Australian Public Service Commission

p : 02 6202 3571 | f : 02 6250 4437
e : 
chris.luton@apsc.gov.au | w : www.apsc.gov.au

Julie Gilbert, allegedly abused by swimming coach Scott Volkers, reveals 'insult' over comments by prosecutor Margaret Cunneen


So again double standards by a shonky dodgy prosecutor.
I wonder how DODGY Margaret Cunneen would like  someone sticking their fingers into her VAGINA and  giving her a rub up when she had a massage!!!
Updated Wed 9 Jul 2014, 8:34am AEST
A former swimmer who alleges she was abused by high-profile coach Scott Volkers says she felt "insulted" by a top prosecutor's comments about her physical response to his advances.
The royal commission into child sex abuse is currently examining how sports bodies and top prosecutors handled allegations of sexual assault made against Mr Volkers by three former students.
Julie Gilbert, Kylie Rogers and Simone Boyce each allege they were abused between the ages of 12 and 14 while swimming in Mr Volkers' training squad in the 1980s and 1990s.
Mr Volkers was committed to stand trial but charges against him were dropped by the Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions in 2002.
Ms Gilbert has told 7.30 that Mr Volkers' high-profile supporters made his alleged victims feel like "the three worst people in Australia" after the charges were dropped.

'Inappropriate' massage on bed in poolside caravan

The former swimmer says she was abused when she was 13 while swimming in Mr Volkers' training squad in the 1980s.
She said the abuse began after she was injured and found herself struggling to get back into the water.
Ms Gilbert told 7.30 that after she was injured, Mr Volkers "decided that he'd take me to a sauna" which led to "inappropriate massage" on the coach's bed in a caravan by the poolside.
The royal commission has been told Mr Volkers was massaging her back and legs when he began rubbing her vagina inside her swimmers until she experienced an orgasm.
Ms Gilbert will say that about two days later, she again went to Mr Volkers' caravan before training.
She says during that massage, he moved his hands between her legs and under her shorts.
"This is not a sports massage. I mean a sports massage is your shoulders, it's out in the open, it's not hidden behind a closed door and certainly not on the coach's bed," she said.

Prosecutor questioned Gilbert's version of events

The decision not to bring new charges against Mr Volkers after the collapse of the 2002 case was made partly on the advice of one of New South Wales's most experienced prosecutors, Margaret Cunneen.
Ms Cunneen is a highly regarded crown prosecutor who last year ran an inquiry into the alleged cover-up of child sexual abuse in NSW.
Ms Cunneen has been praised for her attitude towards child victims of sexual abuse, which she has called "abhorrent" because it "exploits their vulnerability, irreparably damages their innocence, and casts a shadow over their whole lives".
In 2004 Ms Cunneen questioned Ms Gilbert's assertions that Mr Volkers had massaged her breasts.
"It is legitimate to consider whether 12-year-old swimmers even had breasts, but that is the allegation," Ms Cunneen said.
She also questioned whether a female abuse victim could have experienced an orgasm while being abused.
"It is difficult to accept that Gilbert could have been sufficiently relaxed for orgasm to occur," Ms Cunneen wrote in legal advice to the Queensland DPP.
It's hurtful, it's a direct attack on my recollections on an event that she wasn't there for.
Julie Gilbert
Ms Gilbert has told 7.30 the comments were deeply hurtful.
"Why would I make that up? What would I gain by saying this man did this to me?" she said.
"It's hurtful, it's a direct attack on my recollections on an event that she wasn't there for.
"There was no scientific or medical reasoning behind it. And at the same time she hasn't met me, she doesn't know me as an actual person.
"I don't know how you can make all these assumptions when you don't even know who I am."

Abuse ruined career: 'We were nobodies'

Ms Gilbert has told the royal commission how she stopped competitive swimming after the alleged abuse, effectively ending a promising career, and that she developed an eating disorder.
She says one of her lowest moments came when the charges against the swimming coach were dropped.
"I think that they looked at him as a high-profile swimming coach and that we were nobodies and that all we wanted to do was to ruin his reputation," she told 7.30.
"That was done right across the media by sporting and swimming personalities all , you know, we were regarded as the worst three people in Australia the next morning."
After the charges were dropped, Mr Volkers was retained as head coach at the Queensland Academy of Sport.
On Tuesday the organisation's then-chief, Alex Baumann, told the royal commission that he was not concerned about Mr Volkers because he was not working directly with children.
Chief Commissioner Peter McClellan responded: "Mr Baumann, I have difficulty understanding how he could be a head coach and not have contact with children. Can you explain how that is?"
Mr Baumann replied: "In terms of his role he would be the coach's coach."
Hetty Johnson from child sex abuse survivor network Bravehearts says swimming organisations went out of their way to protect Mr Volkers.
"It's sad but it’s not surprising. This was all about the reputation of Australian swimming and the reputation of their golden boy in Scott Volkers and that’s what’s paramount," she said.
"It's not child protection, it’s not the complainants, it is the swimming. It's a boy's club - 'let's get gold and he is our mate, let’s look after him'."